CQF Comprehensive Cheatsheet - Fixed Income
BOND FUNDAMENTALS
Basic Bond Terminology
Face Value/Par (\(F\)): Principal amount (typically $100 or $1000)
Coupon Rate (\(c\)): Annual interest rate on face value
Coupon Payment: \(C = c \times F\) (often paid semi-annually)
Maturity (\(T\)): Time until principal repayment
Yield to Maturity (YTM) (\(y\)): IRR of bond cash flows
Bond Pricing
Discrete compounding (annual):
Semi-annual compounding (US convention):
$$P = \sum_{i=1}^{2n} \frac{C/2}{(1+y/2)^i} + \frac{F}{(1+y/2)^{2n}}$$Continuous compounding:
$$P = \sum_{i=1}^n C e^{-y t_i} + F e^{-yT}$$\(P = \frac{6}{1.05} + \frac{6}{1.05^2} + \frac{6}{1.05^3} + \frac{6}{1.05^4} + \frac{106}{1.05^5}\)
\(= 5.71 + 5.44 + 5.18 + 4.94 + 83.06 = \boxed{\$104.33}\)
Bond trades at premium (coupon > YTM)
Bond Price-Yield Relationship
- \(y < c\): Bond at premium (\(P > F\))
- \(y = c\): Bond at par (\(P = F\))
- \(y > c\): Bond at discount (\(P < F\))
Convexity: Price-yield relationship is convex (good for bondholders)
Zero-Coupon Bonds
Price:
$$P(t,T) = e^{-r(t,T)(T-t)}$$or discrete:
$$P(t,T) = \frac{F}{(1+y)^{T-t}}$$Spot rate \(r(t,T)\): Zero-coupon yield for maturity \(T\)
\(P = \frac{100}{1.04^{10}} = \boxed{\$67.56}\)
Accrued Interest
Clean Price: Quoted price (without accrued)
Dirty Price (Full Price):
Accrued Interest:
$$AI = C \times \frac{\text{Days since last coupon}}{\text{Days in coupon period}}$$- Actual/Actual: US Treasuries
- 30/360: US Corporate bonds
- Actual/360: Money markets
- Actual/365: UK Gilts
YIELD CURVE CONSTRUCTION
Spot Rates and Forward Rates
Spot Rate \(r(0,T)\): Zero-coupon rate from now (0) to time \(T\)
Forward Rate \(f(t,T_1,T_2)\): Rate for period \([T_1, T_2]\) locked in at \(t\)
Relationship (discrete):
Solving for forward:
$$f(0,T_1,T_2) = \frac{(1+r_2)^{T_2}}{(1+r_1)^{T_1}}^{\frac{1}{T_2-T_1}} - 1$$Continuous compounding:
$$f(0,T_1,T_2) = \frac{r_2 T_2 - r_1 T_1}{T_2 - T_1}$$Instantaneous forward rate:
1Y forward 1Y ahead:
\(f = \frac{1.04^2}{1.03^1} - 1 = \frac{1.0816}{1.03} - 1 = 0.0501\) or 5.01%
Bootstrapping the Curve
Method: Extract zero rates from coupon bond prices
Steps:
- Start with shortest maturity (use directly if zero)
- For coupon bond, use previously solved zeros for earlier cash flows
- Solve for the new zero rate
- Move to next maturity
Given:
- 6M T-bill: Price = $97.50, Face = $100 → \(r_{0.5} = 5.13\%\)
- 1Y bond: Coupon = 5%, Price = $98.50
\(98.50 = \frac{2.5}{e^{0.0513 \times 0.5}} + \frac{102.5}{e^{r_1 \times 1}}\)
\(98.50 = 2.44 + 102.5e^{-r_1}\)
\(96.06 = 102.5e^{-r_1}\)
\(e^{-r_1} = 0.9372\)
\(r_1 = 0.0648\) or 6.48%
Interpolation Methods
Linear (on zero rates):
$$r(T) = r_1 + \frac{T - T_1}{T_2 - T_1}(r_2 - r_1)$$Linear (on log discount factors):
$$\ln P(0,T) = \ln P(0,T_1) + \frac{T - T_1}{T_2 - T_1}[\ln P(0,T_2) - \ln P(0,T_1)]$$Cubic Spline: Smooth curve through points
Nelson-Siegel:
- \(\beta_0\): Long-term level
- \(\beta_1\): Short-term component
- \(\beta_2\): Medium-term component (hump)
- \(\tau\): Decay parameter
Svensson Extension: Adds second hump term
DURATION AND CONVEXITY
Macaulay Duration
Definition: Weighted average time to receive cash flows
where \(CF_i\) includes both coupons and principal
Properties:
- Measured in years
- Zero-coupon bond: \(D = T\)
- Lower coupon → higher duration
- Higher yield → lower duration
Modified Duration
Definition: Price sensitivity to yield changes
Price approximation:
$$\frac{dP}{P} \approx -D_{Mod} \cdot dy$$or:
$$\Delta P \approx -D_{Mod} \times P \times \Delta y$$\(D_{Mod} = \frac{7.5}{1.05} = 7.14\)
If \(y\) increases from 5% to 5.5% (\(\Delta y = 0.005\)):
\(\Delta P \approx -7.14 \times 105 \times 0.005 = -\$3.75\)
New price ≈ $105 - $3.75 = $101.25
Dollar Duration (DV01)
Definition: Dollar change for 1 bp (0.01%) yield change
$$\text{DV01} = -\frac{\partial P}{\partial y} \times 0.0001 = D_{Mod} \times P \times 0.0001$$\(\text{DV01} = 7.14 \times 10,000,000 \times 0.0001 = \boxed{\$7,140}\)
1 bp increase → lose $7,140
Convexity
Definition: Second-order price sensitivity
Better price approximation:
Why convexity matters:
- Duration alone underestimates price gain when yields fall
- Duration alone overestimates price loss when yields rise
- Convexity is always positive for option-free bonds
- Higher convexity = better (more upside, less downside)
Duration only:
\(\Delta P = -7 \times 100 \times (-0.01) = \$7.00\)
With convexity:
\(\Delta P = -7 \times 100 \times (-0.01) + 0.5 \times 60 \times 100 \times 0.01^2\)
\(= 7.00 + 0.30 = \boxed{\$7.30}\)
Convexity adds $0.30 (more gain than duration predicts)
Effective Duration
For bonds with embedded options:
$$D_{Eff} = \frac{P_{-\Delta y} - P_{+\Delta y}}{2 \times P_0 \times \Delta y}$$where \(P_{-\Delta y}\) and \(P_{+\Delta y}\) are prices when yield shifts by \(\pm \Delta y\)
INTEREST RATE SWAPS
Plain Vanilla IRS
Definition: Exchange fixed rate for floating rate
- Fixed leg: Pay/receive fixed rate \(R\)
- Floating leg: Receive/pay LIBOR (or SOFR)
- Notional: \(N\) (not exchanged)
- Tenor: Swap maturity (e.g., 5Y, 10Y)
Fixed payer = Short bond + Long FRN
Fixed receiver = Long bond + Short FRN
Swap Rate Derivation
Fair swap rate \(R\): Rate that makes initial swap value = 0
Fixed leg PV:
$$PV_{fixed} = R \times N \times \sum_{i=1}^n \delta_i P(0,T_i)$$where \(\delta_i\) = accrual period (e.g., 0.5 for semi-annual)
Floating leg PV:
$$PV_{float} = N \times [1 - P(0,T_n)]$$Key insight: Floating leg worth par at reset dates
Swap rate (sets \(PV_{fixed} = PV_{float}\)):
The denominator is the annuity factor or PV01
Discount factors: \(P(0,0.5)=0.975, P(0,1)=0.950, P(0,1.5)=0.925, P(0,2)=0.900\)
Annuity = \(0.5(0.975 + 0.950 + 0.925 + 0.900) = 1.875\)
\(R = \frac{1 - 0.900}{1.875} = \frac{0.100}{1.875} = 0.0533\) or 5.33%
Swap Valuation (After Inception)
Value to fixed payer:
where \(F(0,T_{i-1},T_i)\) = forward rate for period \([T_{i-1}, T_i]\)
Alternatively:
$$V_{swap} = PV_{float} - PV_{fixed}$$If rates rise → fixed payer gains (paying below market)
If rates fall → fixed receiver gains
Swap DV01
Definition: Change in swap value per 1 bp parallel shift
$$\text{DV01} = N \times 0.0001 \times \sum_{i=1}^n \delta_i P(0,T_i)$$Approximately: \(\text{DV01} \approx N \times D_{Mod} \times 0.0001\)
Basis Swaps
Definition: Exchange one floating rate for another
Examples:
- 3M LIBOR vs 6M LIBOR
- LIBOR vs SOFR (post-2021)
- EURIBOR vs EONIA
Basis spread: Adjustment to make swap fair
CAPS, FLOORS, AND SWAPTIONS
Interest Rate Caps
Cap: Portfolio of caplets (call options on interest rate)
Caplet Payoff (at \(T_i\)):
$$\text{Payoff} = N \times \delta \times \max(L(T_{i-1}) - K, 0)$$where \(L(T_{i-1})\) = LIBOR set at \(T_{i-1}\), \(K\) = strike rate
Caplet Pricing (Black's formula):
where \(F = F(0,T_{i-1},T_i)\) = forward LIBOR, \(\sigma\) = volatility
Cap value:
$$\text{Cap} = \sum_{i=1}^n \text{Caplet}_i$$\(F = 5.5\%\), \(\sigma = 20\%\), \(T = 1\), \(P(0,1.5) = 0.93\)
\(d_1 = \frac{\ln(0.055/0.05) + 0.02 \times 1}{0.20} = 0.5866\)
\(d_2 = 0.5866 - 0.20 = 0.3866\)
\(N(d_1) = 0.7213, N(d_2) = 0.6505\)
Value = \(1M \times 0.5 \times 0.93 \times [0.055 \times 0.7213 - 0.05 \times 0.6505]\)
= \(465,000 \times [0.0397 - 0.0325] = \boxed{\$3,348}\)
Interest Rate Floors
Floor: Portfolio of floorlets (put options on interest rate)
Floorlet Payoff:
$$\text{Payoff} = N \times \delta \times \max(K - L(T_{i-1}), 0)$$Pricing: Similar to caplet, using Black's formula for puts
Put-Call Parity for Caps/Floors
More precisely:
$$\text{Cap}(K) - \text{Floor}(K) = \text{Swap}_{\text{floating}} - \text{Swap}_{\text{fixed at K}}$$Swaptions
Definition: Option to enter into swap
- Payer swaption: Right to pay fixed in swap
- Receiver swaption: Right to receive fixed in swap
Notation: \(m \times n\) swaption = option expires in \(m\) years, swap lasts \(n\) years
Example: 2×5 payer swaption = right in 2Y to enter 5Y swap paying fixed
Swaption Payoff (payer, at expiry \(T_0\)):
$$\text{Payoff} = \max\left(0, N \times \sum_{i=1}^n \delta_i P(T_0, T_i)[R_{swap}(T_0) - K]\right)$$where \(R_{swap}(T_0)\) = swap rate at option expiry, \(K\) = strike
Black's Formula for Swaptions:
where:
- \(A(0,T_0,T_n) = \sum_{i=1}^n \delta_i P(0,T_i)\) = annuity factor
- \(R_0\) = forward swap rate
- \(\sigma\) = swaption volatility
Payer swaption = Call on swap rate
Receiver swaption = Put on swap rate
\(\sigma = 25\%\), \(T_0 = 1\), annuity = 1.85, notional = $10M
\(d_1 = \frac{\ln(0.055/0.05) + 0.03125}{0.25} = 0.5116\)
\(d_2 = 0.2616\)
\(V = 10M \times 1.85 \times [0.055 \times 0.6953 - 0.05 \times 0.6032]\)
= $18.5M × 0.0082 = $151,700
SHORT RATE MODELS
Vasicek Model
Short rate dynamics:
- \(\kappa\): Mean reversion speed
- \(\theta\): Long-term mean
- \(\sigma\): Volatility
Properties:
- Gaussian (can go negative)
- Mean-reverting
- Affine term structure
Bond pricing formula:
$$P(t,T) = A(t,T) e^{-B(t,T)r_t}$$where:
$$B(t,T) = \frac{1-e^{-\kappa(T-t)}}{\kappa}$$ $$\ln A(t,T) = \left(\theta - \frac{\sigma^2}{2\kappa^2}\right)[B(t,T) - (T-t)] - \frac{\sigma^2 B(t,T)^2}{4\kappa}$$\(B(0,2) = \frac{1-e^{-1}}{0.5} = 1.2642\)
\(\ln A(0,2) = ...\) (calculation omitted)
\(P(0,2) = A \times e^{-1.2642 \times 0.03} = \boxed{0.9235}\)
Cox-Ingersoll-Ross (CIR) Model
Dynamics:
Key difference: Square-root diffusion ensures positive rates
Feller Condition (no boundary at zero):
$$2\kappa\theta \geq \sigma^2$$Distribution: Non-central chi-squared
Bond pricing: Also affine, but more complex formulas
$$P(t,T) = A(t,T) e^{-B(t,T)r_t}$$where \(A(t,T)\) and \(B(t,T)\) are known but lengthy expressions
Hull-White Model (Extended Vasicek)
Dynamics:
Key feature: Time-dependent \(\theta(t)\) allows calibration to initial yield curve
Calibration:
$$\theta(t) = \frac{\partial f(0,t)}{\partial t} + \kappa f(0,t) + \frac{\sigma^2}{2\kappa}(1-e^{-2\kappa t})$$where \(f(0,t)\) = market instantaneous forward rate
Advantages:
- Fits any initial term structure
- Tractable (affine structure)
- Widely used in practice
Black-Derman-Toy (BDT) Model
Dynamics (lognormal):
$$d\ln r_t = [\theta(t) - \frac{\sigma'(t)}{2}]dt + \sigma(t) dW_t$$Or equivalently:
$$\frac{dr_t}{r_t} = \theta(t)dt + \sigma(t)dW_t$$Properties:
- Lognormal rates (always positive)
- Time-dependent volatility \(\sigma(t)\)
- Calibrated to term structure and volatility structure
- Implemented on binomial/trinomial tree
Calibration: Fit \(\theta(t)\) to yield curve, \(\sigma(t)\) to cap/swaption vols
Model Comparison
| Model | Rates | Distribution | Calibration | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasicek | Can be negative | Gaussian | Simple | Theory, ALM |
| CIR | Positive (Feller) | Chi-squared | Simple | Credit, rates |
| Hull-White | Can be negative | Gaussian | Yield curve | Derivatives pricing |
| BDT | Positive | Lognormal | Yield + vol | Exotic options |
| HJM | Flexible | Any | Full curve | Complex derivatives |
| LMM | Positive | Lognormal | Caps/swaptions | Market standard |
HEATH-JARROW-MORTON (HJM) FRAMEWORK
HJM Setup
Key Idea: Model entire forward rate curve, not just short rate
Forward rate dynamics (under \(\mathbb{P}\)):
where \(f(t,T)\) = instantaneous forward rate for maturity \(T\)
No-Arbitrage Condition (HJM Drift Condition)
Under risk-neutral measure \(\mathbb{Q}\):
Interpretation: Drift completely determined by volatility structure
Only need to specify \(\sigma(t,T)\); drift is then given by no-arbitrage
Short Rate from Forward Rates
$$r_t = f(t,t)$$Bond price:
$$P(t,T) = \exp\left(-\int_t^T f(t,u)du\right)$$Special Cases
Constant volatility \(\sigma(t,T) = \sigma\):
- Leads to Ho-Lee model
Exponential volatility \(\sigma(t,T) = \sigma e^{-\kappa(T-t)}\):
- Leads to Hull-White model
Multi-factor HJM:
$$df(t,T) = \alpha(t,T)dt + \sum_{i=1}^n \sigma_i(t,T)dW_t^i$$- High-dimensional (infinite-dimensional in theory)
- Requires numerical methods (Monte Carlo, PDE)
- Volatility structure must be specified carefully
- Computationally intensive
LIBOR MARKET MODEL (LMM/BGM)
LMM Framework
Idea: Model observable forward LIBORs directly
Forward LIBOR \(L_k(t)\) for period \([T_k, T_{k+1}]\):
$$L_k(t) = \frac{1}{\delta_k}\left[\frac{P(t,T_k)}{P(t,T_{k+1})} - 1\right]$$where \(\delta_k = T_{k+1} - T_k\) (typically 3M or 6M)
LMM Dynamics
Under \(T_{k+1}\)-forward measure \(\mathbb{Q}^{k+1}\):
\(L_k(t)\) is a martingale under its "natural" measure \(\mathbb{Q}^{k+1}\)
Under terminal measure \(\mathbb{Q}^N\):
$$\frac{dL_k(t)}{L_k(t)} = -\sum_{j=k+1}^{N-1} \frac{\delta_j \rho_{kj} \sigma_j(t) L_j(t)}{1 + \delta_j L_j(t)} dt + \sigma_k(t) dW_t^N$$where \(\rho_{kj}\) = correlation between \(L_k\) and \(L_j\)
Caplet Pricing in LMM
Black's formula (exact in LMM):
where \(\bar{\sigma}_k^2 = \frac{1}{T_k}\int_0^{T_k} \sigma_k^2(t)dt\)
Calibration: Choose \(\sigma_k(t)\) to match market cap volatilities
Swaption Approximations
Problem: Swap rate is not lognormal in LMM
Solutions:
- Monte Carlo: Simulate LIBOR paths, calculate payoff
- Approximations: "Frozen drift" or other moment-matching
Volatility Structure
Separable form:
$$\sigma_k(t) = \phi_k g(t), \quad t \leq T_k$$- \(\phi_k\): Terminal volatility (calibrated to caps)
- \(g(t)\): Time function (calibrated to swaptions)
Common choices for \(g(t)\):
- Constant: \(g(t) = 1\)
- Exponential: \(g(t) = e^{-\kappa(T_k - t)}\)
- Piecewise constant
Correlation Structure
Common specifications:
Exponential:
$$\rho_{ij} = e^{-\beta|T_i - T_j|}$$Parametric:
$$\rho_{ij} = \rho_{\infty} + (1-\rho_{\infty})e^{-\beta|i-j|}$$INTEREST RATE DERIVATIVES STRATEGIES
Curve Steepeners/Flatteners
Steepener: Profit if curve steepens (long end - short end increases)
Strategy: Receive fixed 10Y, pay fixed 2Y
Flattener: Profit if curve flattens
Strategy: Pay fixed 10Y, receive fixed 2Y
Enter 2Y-10Y steepener (notional adjusted for DV01 neutrality)
If spread → 120 bps, profit
If spread → 80 bps, loss
Butterfly Trades
Setup: Combine three maturities (short, medium, long)
Long butterfly: Profit if middle matures outperforms
Example: Long 5Y, short 2Y and 10Y (DV01-weighted)
Convexity Trade
Long convexity: Buy bonds, profit from large yield moves
Short convexity: Sell options, collect premium, lose if large moves
Basis Trading
LIBOR-OIS spread: Reflects bank credit risk
Trade: If spread widens, banks perceived as riskier
Swap spread: Swap rate - Treasury yield
Trade: Relative value between swaps and government bonds
LIBOR TRANSITION TO SOFR
Background
LIBOR scandal (2012): Banks manipulating submissions
LIBOR cessation: Discontinued after 2021 (USD LIBOR by June 2023)
Replacement rates:
- SOFR (USD): Secured Overnight Financing Rate
- SONIA (GBP): Sterling Overnight Index Average
- €STR (EUR): Euro Short-Term Rate
- TONAR (JPY): Tokyo Overnight Average Rate
SOFR vs LIBOR
| Feature | LIBOR | SOFR |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsecured | Secured (repo) |
| Tenor | Multiple (1M, 3M, 6M, 12M) | Overnight only |
| Credit risk | Includes bank credit | Risk-free (repo collateral) |
| Transaction-based | No (panel submissions) | Yes (~$1T daily volume) |
| Volatility | Lower | Higher (overnight rate) |
Conversion Issues
Spread Adjustment: SOFR ≈ LIBOR - credit spread
ARRC recommendation: Add credit spread adjustment when converting
Example: 3M LIBOR + spread → SOFR + spread + adjustment
Term SOFR: Constructed from SOFR derivatives (forward-looking)
KEY FORMULAS SUMMARY
| Concept | Formula |
|---|---|
| Bond Price | \(\sum C e^{-yt_i} + F e^{-yT}\) |
| Forward Rate (cont.) | \(f = \frac{r_2T_2 - r_1T_1}{T_2-T_1}\) |
| Instantaneous Forward | \(f(t,T) = -\frac{\partial \ln P(t,T)}{\partial T}\) |
| Modified Duration | \(D_{Mod} = \frac{D_{Mac}}{1+y}\) |
| Price Change | \(\frac{\Delta P}{P} \approx -D_{Mod}\Delta y + \frac{1}{2}C(\Delta y)^2\) |
| DV01 | \(D_{Mod} \times P \times 0.0001\) |
| Swap Rate | \(R = \frac{1-P(0,T_n)}{\sum \delta_i P(0,T_i)}\) |
| Caplet (Black) | \(N\delta P(0,T)[FN(d_1) - KN(d_2)]\) |
| Vasicek | \(dr = \kappa(\theta-r)dt + \sigma dW\) |
| CIR | \(dr = \kappa(\theta-r)dt + \sigma\sqrt{r}dW\) |
| HJM Drift | \(\alpha(t,T) = \sigma(t,T)\int_t^T\sigma(t,u)du\) |
| LMM (forward measure) | \(\frac{dL_k}{L_k} = \sigma_k dW^{k+1}\) |
COMMON MISTAKES & TIPS
- Confusing duration types: Macaulay ≠ Modified ≠ Effective
- DV01 sign: Price falls when yield rises (negative relationship)
- Swap direction: Fixed payer = short bond (loses when rates fall)
- Convexity sign: Always positive for option-free bonds
- Forward rates vs spot rates: Forward can exceed spot in upward-sloping curve
- Day count conventions: Critical for precise calculations
- Clean vs dirty price: Must add accrued interest
- Swaption terminology: "Payer" means paying fixed
- Cap/floor parity: Must be at same strike
- LMM measure: Each LIBOR martingale under different forward measure
- Duration intuition: Higher coupon → lower duration (cash sooner)
- Convexity benefit: Asymmetric - more gain up than loss down
- Swap fixed payer: Wants rates to rise (paying below market)
- Why caps like calls: Benefit when rate (underlying) rises above strike
- Swaption = option on swap: Not option on bond
- HJM vs LMM: HJM models all forwards, LMM models discrete LIBORs
- Vasicek negative rates: Can be feature (Europe) or bug
- CIR always positive: If Feller condition holds
- Hull-White advantage: Fits initial curve exactly
- LIBOR → SOFR: SOFR lower (no credit spread), more volatile (overnight)
- Curve steepener: Receive long, pay short
- Basis risk: Different floating indices (3M vs 6M LIBOR)
PRACTICAL EXAMPLE: COMPLETE SWAP PRICING
Market Data:
- Pricing date: Today
- Swap: 3-year, semi-annual, USD
- Notional: $10M
- Day count: Actual/360
- Discount curve (zero rates, continuous):
| 0.5Y: 2.00% | 1.0Y: 2.20% | 1.5Y: 2.40% |
| 2.0Y: 2.55% | 2.5Y: 2.68% | 3.0Y: 2.80% |
\(P(0,0.5) = e^{-0.02 \times 0.5} = 0.9900\)
\(P(0,1.0) = e^{-0.022 \times 1.0} = 0.9782\)
\(P(0,1.5) = e^{-0.024 \times 1.5} = 0.9646\)
\(P(0,2.0) = e^{-0.0255 \times 2.0} = 0.9503\)
\(P(0,2.5) = e^{-0.0268 \times 2.5} = 0.9350\)
\(P(0,3.0) = e^{-0.028 \times 3.0} = 0.9192\)
Task 2: Calculate forward rates
For semi-annual period [0.5, 1.0]:
\(F(0,0.5,1.0) = \frac{P(0,0.5) - P(0,1.0)}{0.5 \times P(0,1.0)} = \frac{0.9900 - 0.9782}{0.5 \times 0.9782} = 0.0241\) or 2.41%
Similarly:
\(F(0,1.0,1.5) = 2.62\%\), \(F(0,1.5,2.0) = 2.79\%\)
\(F(0,2.0,2.5) = 2.94\%\), \(F(0,2.5,3.0) = 3.09\%\)
Task 3: Calculate fair swap rate
Annuity factor:
\(A = 0.5 \times (0.9900 + 0.9782 + 0.9646 + 0.9503 + 0.9350 + 0.9192)\)
\(= 0.5 \times 5.7373 = 2.8687\)
Swap rate:
\(R = \frac{1 - P(0,3.0)}{A} = \frac{1 - 0.9192}{2.8687} = \frac{0.0808}{2.8687} = 0.02817\) or 2.817%
Task 4: Value existing swap (contract rate = 2.5%)
Fixed leg PV (receiving fixed at 2.5%):
\(PV_{fixed} = 0.025 \times 10M \times 2.8687 = \$716,175\)
Floating leg PV:
\(PV_{float} = 10M \times (1 - 0.9192) = \$808,000\)
Value to fixed receiver:
\(V = \$716,175 - \$808,000 = -\$91,825\)
Fixed receiver has loss of $91,825 (receiving 2.5% when market is 2.817%)
Task 5: Calculate swap DV01
\(\text{DV01} = 10M \times 0.0001 \times 2.8687 = \boxed{\$2,869}\)
If rates rise 1 bp across curve, fixed payer gains ~$2,869
Task 6: Hedge with 3Y bond
Need bond position with same DV01:
If 3Y bond has \(D_{Mod} = 2.85\), price = $98:
Bond notional = \(\frac{\$2,869}{2.85 \times 98 \times 0.0001} = \boxed{\$10.26M}\)
To hedge fixed receiver position: short $10.26M of 3Y bonds